Find everything you need to get certified on Fabric—skills challenges, live sessions, exam prep, role guidance, and more.
Get startedGrow your Fabric skills and prepare for the DP-600 certification exam by completing the latest Microsoft Fabric challenge.
Hi,
I've uploaded my pbix file here -> https://ufile.io/dsp0vngv . I have the following data:
And two calculated measures:
Which I've displayed in the visuation table below:
What I don't understand is that for answer c the below line of code is not overriding the existing filter context? i.e. why is every line of the above table visualisation not 5 for the answer d column? I thought the FILTER function leaves the existing filter context intact but then overrides any filter context where a filter is defined within the FILTER function?
I believe this is to the behavior of ALL. I've found ALLEXCEPT to supply a solution for most of these situations. It will remove implicit and explicit filters, with exception those applied ot the columns secified in the expression.
You can also try creating a custom table to see the result of your filter.
filter ( filter ( your filter in the calculate ) , the implicit filters of the visual )
Join the community in Stockholm for expert Microsoft Fabric learning including a very exciting keynote from Arun Ulag, Corporate Vice President, Azure Data.
Ask questions in Eventhouse and KQL, Eventstream, and Reflex.
User | Count |
---|---|
91 | |
81 | |
65 | |
65 | |
60 |
User | Count |
---|---|
170 | |
114 | |
102 | |
73 | |
69 |