Register now to learn Fabric in free live sessions led by the best Microsoft experts. From Apr 16 to May 9, in English and Spanish.
I have three table visuals. Each tables shares the same first two colums (HSECaseDimkey and Case Number). The third column contains a field from the bridged table as shown in the model. If I try to add the bridged Consequecnce field to either of the lower two table visuals, the visual will break complaining about the relationships.
What should I do to allow each of the 3 bridged tables to appear in the top visual?
Hey @Anonymous ,
I don't really understand from which tables you want to show which fields.
But it breaks for sure because of the filter directions.
Why do you use the bridge tables? If possible I would change that. As a "quick solution" you could also set the outer relationships to bidirectional filtering. That should solve the issue in the short term:
Hey @Anonymous ,
I wanted to ask if you could solve it with the change of relationship or if you need further help?
I'm curious if you could solve this issue 🙂
Covering the world! 9:00-10:30 AM Sydney, 4:00-5:30 PM CET (Paris/Berlin), 7:00-8:30 PM Mexico City
Check out the April 2024 Power BI update to learn about new features.
User | Count |
---|---|
105 | |
94 | |
75 | |
63 | |
62 |
User | Count |
---|---|
137 | |
105 | |
104 | |
80 | |
63 |