Cardinality in relationships in semantic model on Lakehouse NOT automatically detected?

[daniele_tiles]

Hi,

it's really weird and a bit disappointing the first approach to Fabric.

The relationship definition between tables it's not automatic. It's automatic on PBI Desktop, but with the full power of the cloud, it's not possible on Fabric? 

I hope this will be fixed. Is there any issue/enhancement about this?

[v-gchenna-msft]

Hello @daniele_tiles ,

Thanks for using Fabric Community.
At this time, we are reaching out to the internal team to get some help on this .
We will update you once we hear back from them.

[v-gchenna-msft · Accepted solution]

Hi @daniele_tiles ,

Internal Team confirmed that they are working on this feature, currently we don't have any ETA on it.
You can find this feature in future.

Hope this is helpful. Please let me know incase of further queries.

[v-gchenna-msft]

Hello @daniele_tiles ,

We haven’t heard from you on the last response and was just checking back to see if you query was answered.
Otherwise, will respond back with the more details and we will try to help .

[daniele_tiles]

Hi,

thanks. Is there a public list of the features for Fabric that Microsoft is actively working on, so we can keep an eye on this one?

[v-gchenna-msft]

Hi @daniele_tiles ,

At present only these information is shared publicly regarding Fabric Upcoming Plans - Microsoft Fabric release plan documentation - Microsoft Fabric | Microsoft Learn .

Hope this is helpful.

[v-gchenna-msft]

Hi @daniele_tiles ,

We haven’t heard from you on the last response and was just checking back to see if you query was answered.
Otherwise, will respond back with the more details and we will try to help .