Earn a 50% discount on the DP-600 certification exam by completing the Fabric 30 Days to Learn It challenge.
I have Location and Sales data which is Hierarchical and displayed in a matrix table for that reason (the countries group to continentes etc.). Simplified example below:
Q1 | Q2 | |||||
Actual | Plan | Difference | Actual | Plan | Difference | |
France | 699 | 762 | -63 | 489 | 552 | -63 |
Germany | 440 | 507 | -67 | 463 | 515 | -51 |
UK | 271 | 313 | -42 | 576 | 618 | -42 |
However i need to show it in the following format with the actual data by quarter, followed by the plan, followed by the calculations for the difference
Actual | Plan | Difference | ||||
Q1 | Q2 | Q1 | Q2 | Q1 | Q2 | |
France | 699 | 489 | 762 | 552 | -63 | -63 |
Germany | 440 | 463 | 507 | 515 | -67 | -51 |
UK | 271 | 576 | 313 | 618 | -42 | -42 |
How i can force the column order to represent table 2, and how i can calculate the difference fields and add them at the end as additional columns (e.g. $ difference and % difference of filtered).
Below is the dataset in original format for testing:
Region | Country | Product | Quarter | sales |
Europe | France | Electric | Q1 | 97 |
Europe | France | Electric | Q2 | 47 |
Europe | France | Electric | Q3 | 29 |
Europe | France | Electric | Q4 | 18 |
Europe | France | ICE | Q1 | 41 |
Europe | France | ICE | Q2 | 43 |
Europe | France | ICE | Q3 | 12 |
Europe | France | ICE | Q4 | 48 |
Europe | Germany | Electric | Q1 | 71 |
Europe | Germany | Electric | Q2 | 12 |
Europe | Germany | Electric | Q3 | 47 |
Europe | Germany | Electric | Q4 | 18 |
Europe | Germany | ICE | Q1 | 27 |
Europe | Germany | ICE | Q2 | 6 |
Europe | Germany | ICE | Q3 | 93 |
Europe | Germany | ICE | Q4 | 88 |
Europe | UK | Electric | Q1 | 28 |
Europe | UK | Electric | Q2 | 51 |
Europe | UK | Electric | Q3 | 78 |
Europe | UK | Electric | Q4 | 2 |
Europe | UK | ICE | Q1 | 13 |
Europe | UK | ICE | Q2 | 84 |
Europe | UK | ICE | Q3 | 7 |
Europe | UK | ICE | Q4 | 79 |
I think this could be an answer to defining the column order, but struggling to make the DAX work on my data. Any advice @Greg_Deckler ?
The New Hotness (Custom Matrix Hierarchy) - Page 2 - Microsoft Power BI Community
User | Count |
---|---|
107 | |
89 | |
81 | |
76 | |
73 |
User | Count |
---|---|
112 | |
104 | |
96 | |
74 | |
66 |