Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Grow your Fabric skills and prepare for the DP-600 certification exam by completing the latest Microsoft Fabric challenge.

Reply
Billgates
New Member

A slicer is not affecting another slicer because of ambiguous relationship

I have 2 dimension tables D1 and D2 and a Fact table F1. D1 -> F1 (1:*), D2 -> F1 (1:*). I have a slicer from D1 which affects the F1. I have another slicer from D2 which also affects F1. I want the slicer from D2 also gets affected while selecting values from slicer D1, in order to achieve this I establised a relationship between D1 -> D2 (1:*), but it turns out to be ambiguous. I'd appreciate your help in fixing this.

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
amitchandak
Super User
Super User

@Billgates , You can use measure from F1 as a visual level filter for dimensions to filter each other. Or create both joins as bi-directional

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cyOquvfhzNM

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2
amitchandak
Super User
Super User

@Billgates , You can use measure from F1 as a visual level filter for dimensions to filter each other. Or create both joins as bi-directional

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cyOquvfhzNM

@amitchandak Thank you very much. It's an eye opener.

Helpful resources

Announcements
Europe Fabric Conference

Europe’s largest Microsoft Fabric Community Conference

Join the community in Stockholm for expert Microsoft Fabric learning including a very exciting keynote from Arun Ulag, Corporate Vice President, Azure Data.

RTI Forums Carousel3

New forum boards available in Real-Time Intelligence.

Ask questions in Eventhouse and KQL, Eventstream, and Reflex.