Register now to learn Fabric in free live sessions led by the best Microsoft experts. From Apr 16 to May 9, in English and Spanish.
So, I've been keeping track of the Recovery Performance Metric at the Artesia gas plant in South East New Mexico, and we have increased our performance into the 98% range, however we get into a point where the methane slippage into the NGL is showing a negative financial impact, however the model here essentially continues to encourage us to recover more and more without taking into account the NGL spec at the facility. Is there any way to incorporate this into the model in terms of a performance metric, maximizing recovery while maintaining as close to our NGL spec as possible in terms of how close to excellent we can run the plant?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.