Register now to learn Fabric in free live sessions led by the best Microsoft experts. From Apr 16 to May 9, in English and Spanish.
wrong rank in negative values
when i select sector and area hierarchy rank for negative values (category bikes) goes wrong
after branch 6 branch 2 should have rank 2
also rank should start from 4
see attached pbix
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bw-_YmJ3Q49gTnpKTnQzNktTZ1k
Solved! Go to Solution.
@giorgiokatr what about :
First create a measure to sum [Total USD], like :
Sum_USD = SUM(temp[Total USD])
Then rank all table and use the last measure as expression:
Rank = RANKX(ALLSELECTED(temp),[Sum_USD],,ASC,Dense)
No filters applied
Filter
cat = {a,b}
filter
firstCat={1} and
cat={b,c}
In this way you will rank the values according to what is selected.
@giorgiokatr wrote:
wrong rank in negative values
when i select sector and area hierarchy rank for negative values (category bikes) goes wrong
after branch 6 branch 2 should have rank 2
also rank should start from 4
see attached pbix
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bw-_YmJ3Q49gTnpKTnQzNktTZ1k
@giorgiokatr wrote:
wrong rank in negative values
when i select sector and area hierarchy rank for negative values (category bikes) goes wrong
after branch 6 branch 2 should have rank 2
also rank should start from 4
see attached pbix
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bw-_YmJ3Q49gTnpKTnQzNktTZ1k
Even with the attached pbix file, your description is not clear for me. Could you show the expected output with some snapshots?
In order to better understand you issue please share how are you claculating the rank.
i want to calculate sales so i created a measure
salesamount = CALCULATE(SUM(Table1[sales]))
then i used
Rank = RANKX(ALL(Table1[branch]),CALCULATE([salesamount],ALLEXCEPT(Table1,Table1[branch],Table1[area],Table1[sector])),,ASC,Dense)
the "hierarchy" in matrix rows is sector>area>branch
but rank is wrong for negative when i filter for example sector or area in slicers
i also used
RANKX(ALL(Table1[branch]),CALCULATE([salesamount]),,ASC,Dense)
but same problem
rank goes 1,2 then in negative values rank is 4 instead of 3
this happen when i filter with a slicer
all branch rank (unfiltered area and sector ) is right
@giorgiokatr you might need to nest the formula with hasonevalue( ).
See this really nice post from @Anonymous http://community.powerbi.com/t5/Desktop/Using-RankX-in-DAX-For-PowerPivot-PowerBI/m-p/42824
Take this example:
Rank by visible = if ( HASONEVALUE(temp[cat]), RANKX(ALLSELECTED(temp[cat]),[Total USD],,ASC,Dense) )
thanks @Bordalos it works ok but the problem is when you have an upper hierarchy in the cat and you filter it.
example
try this in a power bi
and create two slicers one for first cat and a second for cat
if you filter by first cat (example first cat =1)
u will see wrong rank for
RANKX(ALLSELECTED(temp[cat]),[Total USD],,ASC,Dense)
first cat | cat | Total USD |
1 | a | 50 |
1 | b | 20 |
1 | c | -10 |
2 | d | -20 |
@giorgiokatr what about :
First create a measure to sum [Total USD], like :
Sum_USD = SUM(temp[Total USD])
Then rank all table and use the last measure as expression:
Rank = RANKX(ALLSELECTED(temp),[Sum_USD],,ASC,Dense)
No filters applied
Filter
cat = {a,b}
filter
firstCat={1} and
cat={b,c}
In this way you will rank the values according to what is selected.
Covering the world! 9:00-10:30 AM Sydney, 4:00-5:30 PM CET (Paris/Berlin), 7:00-8:30 PM Mexico City
Check out the April 2024 Power BI update to learn about new features.
User | Count |
---|---|
108 | |
100 | |
78 | |
64 | |
58 |
User | Count |
---|---|
148 | |
111 | |
94 | |
84 | |
67 |