I have been using the following formula with RANKX successfully with various tables, but I'm running into an issues where different values get the same rank with the following report:
G - Rank =
VAR temp = SUM ( RANKX_Problem[G] )
RETURN
IF (
temp = 0;
BLANK ();
RANKX (
ALLSELECTED ( RANKX_Problem );
CALCULATE (
SUM ( RANKX_Problem[G] )
);
;
;
Dense
)
)
Notice 201706 has value G=62 and gets RANK 1 correctly, but so does 201702 with G=44
Any help appreciated!
Thanks,
MT
Hi @mturcotte_epq ,
I created a similar file as yours but I don't have these issues. You could get slicer by creating an independent table. Could you share your files?
Ok I managed to post the file on my One Drive:
https://1drv.ms/u/s!ArclD4PLnaKAnxHB4m7EAzuthu6e?e=QWP7ft
Please let me know what I might have overlooked that could explain this unintended behavior for RANKX.
Thanks, MT
Actually, please disregard the link posted in my last message as it appears to be a corrupted version of the report I created to illustrate the problem.
Instead, please use this link below to a ZIP file containing the report:
https://1drv.ms/u/s!ArclD4PLnaKAnxKraQDXUakCrlEb?e=7fa5lx
I created a few columns that also exhibit the unintended behavior of RANKX for non-zero values in columns.
Once again, any help appreciated.
Thanks, MT
You have 11 different values, but the measure only returns ranks of 1 to 3. What is your intention ?
Help when you know. Ask when you don't!
I'm sorry, I thought my intention was obvious...
I would like "G - Rank" to contain the ranks from 1 to 11 based on the values of G.
So G=62 would have G-Rank=1
G=44 would have G-Rank=2
G=37 would have G-Rank=3
...
Thanks, MT
User | Count |
---|---|
223 | |
81 | |
75 | |
73 | |
53 |
User | Count |
---|---|
185 | |
93 | |
83 | |
75 | |
74 |