Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Register now to learn Fabric in free live sessions led by the best Microsoft experts. From Apr 16 to May 9, in English and Spanish.

Reply
RobertSlattery
Resolver III
Resolver III

Previous Day Value

Why does this work...

 

Order Value Prev Day = CALCULATE(
    SUMX(orderLines, [Amount] * RELATED(Order_Types[Sign])),
    FILTER(
        orderLines,
        [Date] = MAX('Dim Date'[Date])
    ),
    ALL(orderLines)
)

But this is all blanks?

Order Value Prev Day = CALCULATE(
    SUMX(orderLines, [Amount] * RELATED(Order_Types[Sign])),
    FILTER(
        orderLines,
        [Date] = MAX('Dim Date'[Date]) - 1
    ),
    ALL(orderLines)
)

This is a measure and I'm using it in a Table whith 'Dim Date'[Date]

 

I have this table for the date dimension...

dim Date = ADDCOLUMNS(CALENDAR([From Date], [To Date]),
    "Year", YEAR([Date]),
    "Date Key", VALUE(FORMAT([Date], "YYYYMMDD")), 
    "FY", 
    VAR m = MONTH([Date])
    VAR y = YEAR([Date])
    RETURN IF(m > 6, y + 1, y)
)

 I'm not using the date hierarchy.

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Nope, ALL just removes all of the context filters but not the relationships. Let me see if there is a way to do that but I'm not sure. 


@ me in replies or I'll lose your thread!!!
Instead of a Kudo, please vote for this idea
Become an expert!: Enterprise DNA
External Tools: MSHGQM
YouTube Channel!: Microsoft Hates Greg
Latest book!:
The Definitive Guide to Power Query (M)

DAX is easy, CALCULATE makes DAX hard...

View solution in original post

6 REPLIES 6
Greg_Deckler
Super User
Super User

Tough to say without source data to replicate but my guess is that when you take the MAX date in the date key table and add 1 to it, you no longer have any dates that match it? If you wanted previous day, wouldn't you want -1?


@ me in replies or I'll lose your thread!!!
Instead of a Kudo, please vote for this idea
Become an expert!: Enterprise DNA
External Tools: MSHGQM
YouTube Channel!: Microsoft Hates Greg
Latest book!:
The Definitive Guide to Power Query (M)

DAX is easy, CALCULATE makes DAX hard...

Yes, sorry, rushed it, should be - 1.  Edited to fix.

 

In answer to your question, I do have dates one day less for all the values selected and I use ALL(orderLines) to open up the context to the whole date range.

Again, tough to say without the data to replicate. But, if you have a relationship between your two tables based on Date. Then you will never have a match between them where date in one table matches -1 date from another table. Does that make sense?


@ me in replies or I'll lose your thread!!!
Instead of a Kudo, please vote for this idea
Become an expert!: Enterprise DNA
External Tools: MSHGQM
YouTube Channel!: Microsoft Hates Greg
Latest book!:
The Definitive Guide to Power Query (M)

DAX is easy, CALCULATE makes DAX hard...

Yes, thanks @Greg_Deckler it makes sense, except that I thought the All() filter would remove that relationship. No?

May

Nope, ALL just removes all of the context filters but not the relationships. Let me see if there is a way to do that but I'm not sure. 


@ me in replies or I'll lose your thread!!!
Instead of a Kudo, please vote for this idea
Become an expert!: Enterprise DNA
External Tools: MSHGQM
YouTube Channel!: Microsoft Hates Greg
Latest book!:
The Definitive Guide to Power Query (M)

DAX is easy, CALCULATE makes DAX hard...

Ok, in that case it now makes perfect sense. I've seen patterns where they say not to have any relationship between tables. Now I understand why.

Helpful resources

Announcements
Microsoft Fabric Learn Together

Microsoft Fabric Learn Together

Covering the world! 9:00-10:30 AM Sydney, 4:00-5:30 PM CET (Paris/Berlin), 7:00-8:30 PM Mexico City

PBI_APRIL_CAROUSEL1

Power BI Monthly Update - April 2024

Check out the April 2024 Power BI update to learn about new features.

April Fabric Community Update

Fabric Community Update - April 2024

Find out what's new and trending in the Fabric Community.