Keep Slicer filter in a "0 instead of Blank" Measure

[Caz_16]

I have a Dashboard that I'm using to show if an employee's time is fully allocated for the next six months. You can see my relationships below. I am filtering down from the Division (highest level), to the Groups, to the Employees. My visualizations are designed for the user to select a bar for the desired month in the top graph (which is the sum of the Employees in the selected Division), and have it populate with the individual employees breakdown for the selected month. 

The Issue: I want to be able to see employees that are not allocated (have a sum of 0 for the selected month). If I use the "+0" trick on the end of my SUM() calculation, I see all of the employees, not just the ones in the Division/Group selected in the slicer. 

This result is your expected result, the slicer is filtering the "Employee Allocation by First_Name...." and it is showing that there are 3 employees in Division 1, Group 1, and what their allocations are. However, there are others in Group 1 who are not allocated for that month ( you can see all the names in Group 1 in the Table on the right). I would like for their names to be along the X-axis. 

So I tried the +0 tactic, where when I SUM(Allocation[PercentAllocation])+0, I get ALL names along the X Axis, including those NOT in Group 1. See below, the highlighted names are NOT in Group 1 (they are in Groups 3 and 4 respectively, and are not listed in my example table). The action of the Table on the right is still correct, so I know my filter theory is correct. 

My expected result: What is below, except the two highlighted names (and in general, names from other groups) are not included in the graph. 

So my two measures are:

Employee Allocation = 
IF([Calendar Filter Conditional] = TRUE(),
CALCULATE(
    SUM(Allocation[Percent Allocation])
))

and

Employee Allocation = 
IF([Calendar Filter Conditional] = TRUE(),
CALCULATE(
    SUM(Allocation[Percent Allocation])+0
))

The measure with the conditional just checks to make sure the top table (Division Value by Date) is filtered. If it isnt, the bottom graph is blank.

Data Structure/Relationships

Thanks in advance.

-Caz

[V-lianl-msft · Accepted solution]

This may be a problem with the relational model. What is the relationship between the slicer you use and the fields in the bar chart? If you use the first formula and select the "show items with no data" option in the x-axis field, will it meet your expected results?

[Caz_16]

Thank you! I could not find that option when I originally made the graph. Turns out I had to have the graph showing data and not be blank in order for that option to become available. Thank you for your help!

-Caz