Skip to main content
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Register now to learn Fabric in free live sessions led by the best Microsoft experts. From Apr 16 to May 9, in English and Spanish.

Reply
sarafenwick
Frequent Visitor

How to Exclude Field from RANKX function

‎03-13-2017 04:06 PM

I am trying to use the RANKX function to show my top 300 items by sales value. I also need to show this broken out by store and product division. 

 

The catch is, I need it to adjust it's ranking so each store location has a top 300 items by sales value, but the product division does not change the rankings. So each Location would have 300 top selling skus, that I could see the number of by Division, but that division doesn't affect the rankings

 

My rankx formula is: 

 

Top 300 SkusB = rankx(allselected('2016844 Ontario Ltd$Replen_ Item Quantity'[Item No_]),calculate(sum('2016844 Ontario Ltd$Value Entry$VSIFT$4'[Sales Amount (Actual)])))

 

Is there a way to have the division code excluded from the rankings when I put it in the ideal layout as shown below?

 

 

Top 300 for 1 location with division - want the total skus to be 300Top 300 for 1 location with division - want the total skus to be 300top 300 all locations - this is correcttop 300 all locations - this is correcttop 300 skus one locationtop 300 skus one locationIdeal Table LayoutIdeal Table Layout

Labels:
Message 1 of 5
1,968 Views
0
4 REPLIES 4
v-qiuyu-msft
Community Support
Community Support

‎03-16-2017 12:29 AM

@sarafenwick Any dummy data and desired results shared is appreciated.

Community Support Team _ Qiuyun Yu
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
Message 2 of 5
1,940 Views
0
sarafenwick
Frequent Visitor
In response to v-qiuyu-msft

‎03-17-2017 05:25 AM

See below for sample data. The desired result would rank as follows below... it would rank each location separately but not each division. So ideally I could show the out of stocks by location for the top 300 grossing skus, but be able to show which divisions those skus come from without showing the top 300 grossing skus by location by division. 

 

 

 

Item No_Total Sales ValueNot in StockTotal SkusLocation CodeItem Division Code
1000122530.9711S14-MAINGR
1000135130.66 1S03-MAINGR
1000135130.66 1S04-MAINGR
1000135130.66 1S05-MAINGR
1000135130.66 1S06-MAINGR
1000135130.66 1S07-MAINGR
1000135130.66 1S08-MAINGR
1000135130.66 1S09-MAINGR
1000135130.66 1S10-MAINGR
1000135130.66 1S11-MAINGR
1000135130.66 1S12-MAINGR
1000135130.66 1S13-MAINGR
1000145433.83 1DC-MAINGR
1000145433.83 1S02-MAINGR
1000145433.83 1S03-MAINGR
1000145433.83 1S04-MAINGR
1000145433.83 1S05-MAINGR
1000145433.83 1S06-MAINGR
1000145433.83 1S07-MAINGR
1000145433.83 1S08-MAINGR
1000145433.83 1S09-MAINGR
1000145433.83 1S10-MAINGR
1000145433.83 1S11-MAINGR
1000145433.83 1S12-MAINGR
1000145433.83 1S13-MAINGR
10003315487.2911S14-MAINDG
10003315487.29 1DC-MAINDG
10005122407.1911S13-MAINDG
10005122407.19 1S02-MAINDG
10005122407.19 1S03-MAINDG
10005122407.19 1S04-MAINDG
10005122407.19 1S05-MAINDG
10005122407.19 1S06-MAINDG
10005122407.19 1S07-MAINDG
10005122407.19 1S08-MAINDG
10005122407.19 1S09-MAINDG
10005122407.19 1S10-MAINDG
10005122407.19 1S11-MAINDG
10005122407.19 1S12-MAINDG

 

Desired Result Ranking: 

Item No_Total Sales ValueNot in StockTotal SkusLocation CodeItem Division CodeDesired Rank Outcome
10003315487.29 1DC-MAINDG1
1000145433.83 1DC-MAINGR2
10005122407.19 1S02-MAINDG1
1000145433.83 1S02-MAINGR2
10005122407.19 1S03-MAINDG1
1000145433.83 1S03-MAINGR2
1000135130.66 1S03-MAINGR3
10005122407.19 1S04-MAINDG1
1000145433.83 1S04-MAINGR2
1000135130.66 1S04-MAINGR3
10005122407.19 1S05-MAINDG1
1000145433.83 1S05-MAINGR2
1000135130.66 1S05-MAINGR3
10005122407.19 1S06-MAINDG1
1000145433.83 1S06-MAINGR2
1000135130.66 1S06-MAINGR3
10005122407.19 1S07-MAINDG1
1000145433.83 1S07-MAINGR2
1000135130.66 1S07-MAINGR3
10005122407.19 1S08-MAINDG1
1000145433.83 1S08-MAINGR2
1000135130.66 1S08-MAINGR3
10005122407.19 1S09-MAINDG1
1000145433.83 1S09-MAINGR2
1000135130.66 1S09-MAINGR3
10005122407.19 1S10-MAINDG1
1000145433.83 1S10-MAINGR2
1000135130.66 1S10-MAINGR3
10005122407.19 1S11-MAINDG1
1000145433.83 1S11-MAINGR2
1000135130.66 1S11-MAINGR3
10005122407.19 1S12-MAINDG1
1000145433.83 1S12-MAINGR2
1000135130.66 1S12-MAINGR3
10005122407.1911S13-MAINDG1
1000145433.83 1S13-MAINGR2
1000135130.66 1S13-MAINGR3
10003315487.2911S14-MAINDG1
1000122530.9711S14-MAINGR2

 

Message 3 of 5
1,933 Views
0
Vvelarde
Community Champion
Community Champion
In response to sarafenwick

‎03-17-2017 08:13 AM

@sarafenwick

 

Try with this:

 

Ranking = CALCULATE(RANKX(ALLSELECTED(Table1[Item No_]);CALCULATE(SUM(Table1[Total Sales Value])));ALLEXCEPT(Table1;Table1[Item No_];Table1[Location Code]))




Lima - Peru
Message 4 of 5
1,929 Views
0
sarafenwick
Frequent Visitor
In response to Vvelarde

‎03-17-2017 12:36 PM

This is very close. I can now get it in a table like below and it does rank properly... the issue is when i try to summarize the data by division and location in a matrix. 

 

I want to filter the rank to top 300. Which is fine for the table, but in the matrix it is showing all values and not taking the 300 filter into account. Any thoughts? As you can see in the table the total skus are 300 which is right, the matrix has 6768 but should total to only 300.

 

Table of Top 300Table of Top 300Matrix of Top 300Matrix of Top 300

 

 

 

 

Message 5 of 5
1,922 Views
0

Helpful resources

Announcements
Microsoft Fabric Learn Together

Microsoft Fabric Learn Together

Covering the world! 9:00-10:30 AM Sydney, 4:00-5:30 PM CET (Paris/Berlin), 7:00-8:30 PM Mexico City

PBI_APRIL_CAROUSEL1

Power BI Monthly Update - April 2024

Check out the April 2024 Power BI update to learn about new features.

April Fabric Community Update

Fabric Community Update - April 2024

Find out what's new and trending in the Fabric Community.

View All