Register now to learn Fabric in free live sessions led by the best Microsoft experts. From Apr 16 to May 9, in English and Spanish.
Hello,
I need to feed this logic into a measure.
A | B | C | Is Exclude |
blank | blank | blank | yes |
blank | blank | 0 | yes |
blank | 0 | blank | yes |
blank | 0 | 0 | yes |
0 | blank | blank | yes |
0 | blank | 0 | yes |
0 | 0 | blank | yes |
0 | 0 | 0 | yes |
E.g. if I feed the above in a measure it would look like below.
Exclude1 := SWITCH(TRUE(),
[A]=BLANK()&&[B]=BLANK()&&[C]=BLANK(),"Exclude",
[A]=BLANK()&&[B]=BLANK()&&[C]=0,"Exclude",
..............................................
..............................................
[A]=0&&[B]=0&&[C]=0,"Exclude",
"Include")
Is it safe to assume that the measure below will produce exactly the same result as the one above
Exclude2 := SWITCH(TRUE(),
[A]=BLANK()&&[B]=BLANK()&&[C]=BLANK(),"Exclude",
"Include")
I once read in one of Zubair's post @Zubair_Muhammad that DAX treats BLANK() as zero. If that is the case, can Exclude1 be optimized as Exclude2?
Thank you in advance.
Solved! Go to Solution.
@smpa01 , March 2020 release support coalesce , you can do like
Switch(True()
coalesce([A],0) =0 && coalesce([B],0)=0 && coalesce([C],0) =0 , "Exclude",
"Include")
@smpa01 , March 2020 release support coalesce , you can do like
Switch(True()
coalesce([A],0) =0 && coalesce([B],0)=0 && coalesce([C],0) =0 , "Exclude",
"Include")
@amitchandak did not have time to test out....crazy week... will come back to you after testing.
Covering the world! 9:00-10:30 AM Sydney, 4:00-5:30 PM CET (Paris/Berlin), 7:00-8:30 PM Mexico City
Check out the April 2024 Power BI update to learn about new features.
User | Count |
---|---|
112 | |
100 | |
80 | |
64 | |
57 |
User | Count |
---|---|
145 | |
111 | |
92 | |
84 | |
66 |