Summary
"How is my company doing?"
It's a question we hear often. It seems simple enough, but answering it is a complex process. This report is designed to answer the question in a clear and straightforward manner, while providing enough detail to take some action.
If we wanted to further develop this story, we would build on the outcomes of our Sales Scorecard by adding additional reports with more granular data. Each of these report tabs would answer one specific question that arises from use of our Sales Scorecard.
Approach
A report is most valuable when it's actionable. We started by identifying which components of the process we can influence:
- What we're selling (products)
- Where we're selling (region, state)
- When we're selling (month, year)
- Who is doing the selling (salesperson)
We then determined the report's focus: areas that are not performing well. We used color to highlight these problem areas, and leveraged a matrix with conditional formatting to give us granular insights that could prompt strategy changes. Finally, we included comparisons of profit and sales against prior years to put the performance into perspective. We leveraged basic Power BI elements (cards, shapes, tree maps, and DAX) to develop a KPI section in the top right of these charts to provide additional context.
From this report it's clear that we should evaluate our training programs. We may want to pick up the phone and follow up with William, who seems to be struggling in several areas, most notably in OSHA supplies which is a profitable area for all other sales staff.
We might also want to look further into the strange profit behavior in Mar 2013, where we saw a large dip compared to the prior year.
A report like this is the first step into answering the question "How is my company doing?"
Pushing the Boundaries
Every so often you have a clear vision of how to communicate something, but you aren't quite able to realize that vision with the default tools or options. Custom visuals is one method to help realize your vision, but I'm not a D3 expert and I like a challenge, so sometimes I'll attempt to repurpose default tools in non-standard ways to achieve the same effect.
I had a vision for what I wanted my KPI visualization to look like:
The main elements are:
- % Growth Year over Year (main value)
- Current Year value (adds context)
- Prior Year value (adds context)
- Indicator (quick recognition of good/bad state)
I started with a card for my main value, the % Growth Year over Year. I then created 2 dax measures to format my Current Year and Prior Year values nicely for display (using FORMAT to add "CY: " or "PY: " in front of the value for context). I put each of those into separate cards and arranged them next to my % Growth card.
Finally, I created the indicators. I made a triangle shape, colored it grey, and oriented it upwards. I made a second triangle shape, colored it red, and oriented it downwards, and aligned it directly under the upward triangle. I then created 2 dax measures called KPI Red and KPI Grey.
KPI Red = 1 when % Growth is Positive and 0 when % Growth is Negative.
KPI Grey = 0 when % Growth is Positive and 1 when % Growth is Negative.
I then put each of those into individual tree maps, changed the data colors to match the background, and arranged the tree maps over the tops of the triangles. Now when % Growth is negative, KPI Red is 0 and the tree map disappears and shows the red triangle underneath, while KPI Greyis 1 and the tree map covers the grey arrow.
Wrapping it up
The method above worked pretty well and got me what I wanted. However there are a few oddities - light white lines that outline the tree maps, the arrows are in different locations if they are up or down (because they're 2 different triangles), and the CY and PY are centered rather than left aligned since they're in cards.
Ultimately, this got us where we needed to go for now. However, as a next step I would begin investigating how to turn this into a custom visual to make future use much simpler. For now, it's great to know that we can leverage basic Power BI elements like triangles to create custom KPIs. It just takes a bit of thinking outside the box, plus some creative use of DAX and willingness to use standard visuals (tree maps) in non-standard ways (covers to hide something).
4/12 Update: Simplify using UNICHAR
I just discovered the UNICHAR function in DAX, and used this to simplify my process! Currently we have 2 elements for each indicator, for a total of 8 elements. This method cuts the elements in half!
- Delete the tree maps and the arrow objects
- Delete the KPI Red/Green measures for Sales and Profit (4 total)
- Create 4 new measures
- Sales Indicator Positive = IF(AND(HASONEVALUE('Date'[Fiscal Year]),'Sales Scorecard'[Sales YoY Growth]>0),UNICHAR(11205),"")
- Sales Indicator Negative = IF(AND(HASONEVALUE('Date'[Fiscal Year]),'Sales Scorecard'[Sales YoY Growth]<0),UNICHAR(11206),"")
- Profit Indicator Negative = IF(AND(HASONEVALUE('Date'[Fiscal Year]),'Sales Scorecard'[Profit YoY Growth]<0),UNICHAR(11205),"")
- Profit Indicator Positive = IF(AND(HASONEVALUE('Date'[Fiscal Year]),'Sales Scorecard'[Profit YoY Growth]>0),UNICHAR(11206),"")
- Put each measure in a separate card.
- Change the Data Label colors to make the down arrows red and the up arrows grey
- Arrange your arrows and you're done!
With this method, we are using the UNICHAR to display UNICODE arrow characters. Since we're doing this in DAX, we can us IF statements to hide/show the arrows based on our measures, which means we no longer need to use the tree maps as covers, cutting our number of elements in half! Less elements = easier to maintain.
Enjoy!
Jared Knutzen | Visualization Consultant
Decisive Data | www.decisivedata.net
Have you tried using the 'Diverging' Option in the Data Colors format options when you have the bar chart selected?
I believe that should do the trick?
Matt
Hi @Anonymous, thank you! Correct, I tend to use reports more than dashboards. I find reports more useful as they are interactive, customizable ways to interact with the data. Dashboards feel very static to me, and I am not able to customize the presentation very much.
In general, I use:
- Reports to layout the information and present a story
- Dashboards to quickly navigate to reports
I think dashboards can be great to create collections of reports and make it easy to find them. However instead of pinning charts and visuals to a dashboard, I tend to create text boxes with report names and link them to my reports. Then I go to my dashboard and it's just a single click to my favorite reports 🙂
Regarding the Profitable/Unprofitable coloring in the bar charts, I am using color saturation. I have two measures, Sales and Profit.
- Sales = SUM('Sales Scorecard'[Sales Column])
- Profit = SUM('Sales Scorecard'[Profit Column])
To create each bar chart, I am using Sales as the Value, and then choosing a different value for Axis on each chart. To create the coloring by profitability, I put Profit on Color Saturation.
By default, this gives me a color gradient based on the value of Profit. As a best practice, I try to avoid gradients. For the purpose of this report, I want to call attention to areas that are unprofitable. If something is profitable I'm going to ignore it, because this dashboard is all about finding problem areas and fixing them - so I really want to make those problem areas pop!
I decided to use red to call out the problem areas, and gray for other areas (so I don't pay much attention to them). To do this, I chose a diverging color palette (because I only want 2 colors) and set Minimum to red and Maximum to gray.
Now, here's trick: I set the Minimum and Maximum settings as close to each other as possible, which removes the gradient and lets me choose exactly where the color changes. I want everything with a positive Profit value to be gray, so I set Maximum to 0. Now anything above 0 will show the Maximum color, which I've set to gray. Then I set the Minimum to -0.00001. Now, essentially the color can only be Minimum or Maximum and never anything in between! With this method, I just get 2 colors, and I never have a gradient because there are no values in between the Minimum and Maximum 🙂
Caution: You do have to be careful using this method if your values are very small or you could still get a gradient. One way around this is to create another measure, something like "Profitable" and set it to 1 or 0 depending on if it is profitable or not. Then you can use this secondary measure (more like a flag) on color saturation, and you know it will only ever be a 1 or a 0!
Hope that helps!