Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Register now to learn Fabric in free live sessions led by the best Microsoft experts. From Apr 16 to May 9, in English and Spanish.

Reply
roxieli123
Frequent Visitor

creating measure which compares values from two different tables with the same key

Hi all, 

 

I am currently building a dashboard which compares two datasources for Security Ratings. 

Let's say the two tables are named 'Source1' and 'Source2', both has [Cusip](which is the unique id for securities), and [RatingValue]

 

I want to see whether 'table1'[RatingValue] = 'table2'[Ratingvalue] for every Table1[Cusip] = Table2[Cusip], return false if they dont match, true if they match. My idea is to use dax function Related() but I havent figured out how to. 

 

Could anyone help with this? Greatly appreciated. 

3 REPLIES 3
Nathaniel_C
Super User
Super User

Hi @roxieli123 ,

So created two tables with your columns. However since I could not tell from your post whether all Cusip in one table are in the other, I made some different. I linked the tables in PQ as 1:1. Both tables are on the dashboard so you can see my data. The measure is at the top of the screen and below. You could break apart the IF so that you could have a third response of not in the table. Right now if there is not a match for whatever reason it is a False.

 

If this solves your issues, please mark it as the solution, so that others can find it easily. Kudos are nice too.
Nathaniel

 

Source2 has the same rating value as Source1 = CALCULATE(IF(Max(Source2[Cusip]) = max(Source1[Cusip]) && Max(Source2[RatingValue]) = MAX(Source1[RatingValue]), "True", "False"))

 

Ratings from two tables 2.PNG

 

 

Ratings from two tables.PNG

 

 





Did I answer your question? Mark my post as a solution!

Proud to be a Super User!




@roxieli123 ,

Thinking about this more, you can drop the CALCULATE()

IF(Max(Source2[Cusip]) = max(Source1[Cusip]) && Max(Source2[RatingValue]) = MAX(Source1[RatingValue]), "True", "False")
 
If this solves your issues, please mark it as the solution, so that others can find it easily. Kudos are nice too.
Nathaniel




Did I answer your question? Mark my post as a solution!

Proud to be a Super User!




Hi Nathaniel,

 

Thank you for your response! Your solution works when I only have Cusip, Source1[BondRatingCode], Source2[BondRatingCode] and the measure Compare in one table. (I have filters to show only one Cusip so it's clear to see what is happening) 

1.png

 

However, when I add another column [BondRating], which should be corresponding to [BondRatingCode], such that each [BondRating] correspond to a [BondRatingCode],  seen as screen shot below. 

3.png

 

The result table in theory shouldn't change besides having one more column [BondRating], however, after I added [bondRating], it seems like the table populated each Cusip with all possibilities of [BondRating], which makes the result incorrect,  seen in the screenshot below. Do you know how this can be resolved?  

the relationship between the two table is one-to-one on [Cusip], both direction. 

 

2.png

Helpful resources

Announcements
Microsoft Fabric Learn Together

Microsoft Fabric Learn Together

Covering the world! 9:00-10:30 AM Sydney, 4:00-5:30 PM CET (Paris/Berlin), 7:00-8:30 PM Mexico City

PBI_APRIL_CAROUSEL1

Power BI Monthly Update - April 2024

Check out the April 2024 Power BI update to learn about new features.

April Fabric Community Update

Fabric Community Update - April 2024

Find out what's new and trending in the Fabric Community.

Top Solution Authors