Register now to learn Fabric in free live sessions led by the best Microsoft experts. From Apr 16 to May 9, in English and Spanish.
I am attempting to calculate an inverse running total on values. So I would in essence start with a value, 100, and in an indexed format reduce that value based on the next indexed field.
Example:
Index | Value | Running Difference |
1 | 100 | 100 |
2 | 10 | 90 |
3 | 40 | 50 |
4 | 40 | 10 |
5 | 20 | -10 |
Solved! Go to Solution.
Running Diff =
MINX( FILTER( INFO, INFO[Index] = 1 ), INFO[Value] )
- SUMX(
FILTER( INFO, 1 < INFO[Index] && INFO[Index] <= EARLIER( INFO[Index] ) ),
INFO[Value]
)
Thanks to the great efforts by MS engineers to simplify syntax of DAX! Most beginners are SUCCESSFULLY MISLED to think that they could easily master DAX; but it turns out that the intricacy of the most frequently used RANKX() is still way beyond their comprehension! |
DAX is simple, but NOT EASY! |
Running Diff =
MINX( FILTER( INFO, INFO[Index] = 1 ), INFO[Value] )
- SUMX(
FILTER( INFO, 1 < INFO[Index] && INFO[Index] <= EARLIER( INFO[Index] ) ),
INFO[Value]
)
Thanks to the great efforts by MS engineers to simplify syntax of DAX! Most beginners are SUCCESSFULLY MISLED to think that they could easily master DAX; but it turns out that the intricacy of the most frequently used RANKX() is still way beyond their comprehension! |
DAX is simple, but NOT EASY! |
This solved my needs, thank you very much!
Covering the world! 9:00-10:30 AM Sydney, 4:00-5:30 PM CET (Paris/Berlin), 7:00-8:30 PM Mexico City
Check out the April 2024 Power BI update to learn about new features.
User | Count |
---|---|
47 | |
24 | |
19 | |
14 | |
10 |
User | Count |
---|---|
57 | |
49 | |
44 | |
18 | |
18 |